…it’s going to be really good if it’s good enough to have something derogatory said about it that’s [believed to be] detrimental to how good it is, but it is not affected…
- It has to be a monumentally good/+er thing
- The derogatory slight must be seen /seem to completely defame it
- It therefore must be oblivious – to the point of being callous, which also seems to defame it
- It remains oblivious
- The ‘libelous’ angle & it’s perpetrator may carry on regardless
…& a feeling can be sustained or even elevated, quoshed/dissipated.
The sequence of events is tracked & the best monument to success is forever ripped on while it is however aspired to….
Is this the way of things these days (vis-a-vis the individual getting what they construe themselves to be doing or need to understand about what they do)…?
CH p.p. JC